PRP vs Cortisone Injections: What’s More Effective?

PRP vs Cortisone Injections for treating chronic pain

When it comes to treating chronic joint or muscle pain, cortisone injections have long been the go-to. But regenerative therapies like Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) are quickly gaining popularity as patients seek longer-term, non-surgical solutions. So how do these two treatments really compare?

Let’s break down the benefits, risks, and ideal use cases for both.

What Are Cortisone Injections?

Cortisone shots are a type of steroid injection that helps reduce inflammation. They’re often used to manage arthritis, tendonitis, and other painful orthopedic conditions. While they can provide quick relief, the effects are typically temporary—lasting a few weeks to a few months.

What Is PRP Therapy?

PRP uses your body’s own platelets—extracted and concentrated from a small blood draw—to stimulate healing. It’s part of a growing field called regenerative medicine. PRP is often used for conditions like tennis elbow, rotator cuff injuries, knee pain, and even spine issues.

PRP vs Cortisone: Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCortisone InjectionsPRP Therapy
PurposeReduce inflammation & painPromote natural healing
Onset of ReliefFast (within days)Slower (can take weeks)
Duration of ReliefShort-term (weeks to months)Long-term (months to over a year)
Number of InjectionsLimited over lifetime (tissue damage)Varies; usually safe to repeat
Insurance CoverageOften coveredMay not be covered
 

Which Treatment Is Right for You?

It depends on your condition, goals, and overall health. If you’re looking for fast, short-term relief from inflammation, cortisone may help. But if you’re aiming to promote long-term healing, especially for chronic tendon or joint problems, PRP may be a more sustainable option.

👉 Always consult with a pain management doctor or orthopedic specialist in Bend, OR to determine which treatment is best for you.